How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2002 Evaluation of Methods to Quantify Herbicide Penetration in Leaves
ANTHONY D. WHITE, CAROL A. HEAVERLO, MICHEAL D. K. OWEN
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Epicuticular wax is a major barrier to the movement of foliar-applied herbicides into plant leaves. Many researchers have evaluated the penetration of herbicides in plants using similar methods. However, the methods used to remove unabsorbed herbicide from the leaf surface have been inconsistent among scientists. Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of various compounds as a leaf wash for removing unabsorbed 14C-labeled herbicides from shattercane and velvetleaf leaves. Product B and Product C provided poor results as a leaf wash compared with water, chloroform, methanol, and Product A. Product A increased the amount of 14C-bentazon removed from velvetleaf by 26% compared with the amount removed by chloroform, methanol, or water. Removal of 14C-nicosulfuron was not different between chloroform, Product A, methanol, or water. Although water was the best treatment for the two salts of 14C-glyphosate, Product A was as good or better than chloroform and methanol.

Nomenclature: Bentazon; glyphosate; nicosulfuron; shattercane, Sorghum bicolor L. #3 SORBI; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti L. # ABUTH.

Additional index words: Epicuticular wax, leaf wash, radiolabeled herbicides.

Abbreviations: IPA, isopropylamine; LSS, liquid scintillation spectrometry; TMS, trimethylsulfonium.

ANTHONY D. WHITE, CAROL A. HEAVERLO, and MICHEAL D. K. OWEN "Evaluation of Methods to Quantify Herbicide Penetration in Leaves," Weed Technology 16(1), 37-42, (1 January 2002). https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0037:EOMTQH]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 January 2002
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top